No actual windows were reported broken.

Word is that the sit-in strikers at Chicago’s Republic Windows and Doors have voted to end their protest, having reached a $1.75 million agreement with the company that will pay each worker eight weeks’ salary, all vacation time owed, and two months’ health care, which comes out to about $7000 per worker. Apparently, Bank of America did, indeed, come through with a loan, with JPMorgan Chase pitching in a small amount.

And nobody got hurt. That wasn’t so hard, was it?

Actually, yes. It was way harder than it should have been. But I hope the next one goes as smoothly.

Advertisement
This entry was posted in Economics, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to No actual windows were reported broken.

  1. Mumbo says:

    You’re right, it was harder than it should have been. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act (WARN) stipulates that companies employing more than 100 workers are required to give sixty days notice to employees when they plan on closing a plant. I believe that in the absence of such notification the employer is required to compensate employees for that sixty day period. Therefore, Republic Windows did what was required by law, nothing more– and it sounds as though they and B of A did so kicking and screaming. Bastards.

    Good stuff, Fletch.

  2. BT says:

    Bastards? Maybe the company, but I don’t think BoA is blame.

    I understand the purpose of the wall street bailout was to loosen credit. But do we really want to loosen credit for failing companies? What good is it to extend funds to an already bankrupt firm? Isn’t that what got us into this mess, that is, lending money to people who couldn’t possibly pay it back?

    I don’t have a gripe against the workers, I just don’t think we should force banks to throw good money after bad.

    Alternative Analysis through looking at the Dicta.

  3. Jeana says:

    Unions, strikes, crumbling economy…blah, blah, blah. Are you going to do any Golden Globe coverage?

  4. Mumbo says:

    Maybe BoA isn’t to blame (directly), but the bank has already received a bailout from the government, ostensibly to reinvigorate the economy, etc. As has already been argued elsewhere: what is BoA supposed to do, sit on the money? And yes, BoA (as well as other banks) are bastards, if not for this, then for plenty of other reasons.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s